Social media for academics

Earlier this week Steven Hamblin wrote a blog post requesting help as he develops a presentation on social media use in Academia.  This has prompted me to put a presentation up on Slideshare; one that is related closely to this topic. This presentation was something I put together back in March, and looking further back, it evolved from discussions with my PhD student Crystal Ernst, and from a presentation given at the Entomological Society of Canada’s annual conference last autumn.  It’s far from perfect, a bit outdated now, but hopefully contains some useful information. Enjoy! (and please share and comment!).

About these ads

3 thoughts on “Social media for academics

  1. Pingback: Link Roundup: Bad headlines, social media for academics, women in science, and the 8th Conference of the Science Journalists | Science, I Choose You!

  2. I really like this presentation. I completely agree with the importance of having content ready before launching your blog. I started blogging about my research interested in September of 2011, but it wasn’t until early 2013 that I finally got into consistent and regular updating and readership engagement both popular and scientific skyrocketed with constant posts.

    But I thought a few things were missing from the presentation. It would be nice to see a discussion of G+, I think it has a more science-oriented community than Twitter (and definitely more so than Facebook) and is a good ‘entry-blog’ with easy communication that can easily be integrated with blogger blogs if you want to switch to a more long-form content later. It would be nice to discuss specific tools for reaching scientists: [researchblogging](http://www.researchblogging.org/), [scienceseeker](http://scienceseeker.org/) and popular audience: reddit. There is also a category of interactions that was not mentioned Q&A sites. In particular, there are 3 research level or friendly websites that I am familar with: [academia.SE](http://academia.stackexchange.com/), [cstheory.SE](http://cstheory.stackexchange.com/users/1037/artem-kaznatcheev), and [mathoverflow](http://mathoverflow.net/). Of course, there are ones for fields relevant to this blog’s audience, like [biology](http://biology.stackexchange.com/users/500/artem-kaznatcheev) and [bioinformatics](http://www.biostars.org/) but the first is non-academic and the second I have no experience with.

    Finally, I really appreciate your efforts in encouraging students to blog! I think it is especially important for undergraduate students starting in labs, it is important to blog since it gets them writing about science and prepares them for eventual publications.

    • Thanks for your comments! I agree – a lot of things were missed. I’m relatively new to Google+ and haven’t yet fully explored its potential. And I certainly should have mentioned scienceseeker & researchblogging in the presentation – they are both excellent. I’m not as familiar with some of the other links you posted – I will look into them.

      I guess the problem is that the talk was only supposed to be 50 minutes long – just not enough time to add everything I should have (perhaps I’ll have to work on a follow-up presentation..)

      Again, much thanks for the comments! Always appreciated.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s