Last week I wrote a post about ingredients for success in Academia, and I thought I would follow up this week by examining, in detail, my ‘work week’. It’s also timely given discussions I have been having with my own students, and about some recent blog posts about time, projects, and the big balancing act of Academia.
I was really curious about how I spend my time: sometimes it seems that I work ALL the time, and I am constantly feeling pulled in various directions – how much do I really work ? Perhaps more relevant for aspiring Academics: is it possible for Academics to find a some kind of reasonable work-life balance? Is it possible to have a family and outside activities and interests and still be successful in your job?
A quick look on-line shows quite a range of opinions on the topic. You can go back to a publication in 1942 by W.W. Charters. In this piece, the median hours per week for a Professor was 58 hrs (yikes!) with Associate Professors reporting 52 hrs per work week, and Assistant Professors clocking in at over 60 hrs per week.
More recently, in a nice piece in the Chronicle of Higher Education, Rob Jenkins discusses a question he fielded during a panel discussion about academic careers: How many hours would you estimate that you work each week?
Here is some relevant text that formed the response:
Both the professor from the liberal-arts college and I said that we spend about 50 – 55 hours per week at our jobs…The professor from the midsize university, who has two toddlers at home, seemed almost apologetic when she noted that right now she “only” works about 45 hours per week, but that she’s looking forward to being able to do more when her children start school. And the research professor from the host university, who runs a large laboratory, topped us all when he noted that he spends upwards of 70 hours per week on campus.
What is most striking in that paragraph is the variation in responses! And, of course, much depends on how you define ‘work’, and the overall context (Young family at home? Running a large research laboratory?). I would, however, be curious if the perception of those hours is actually true, i.e., if the hours were quantified.
In a project similar to mine, Philip Nel tracked all his work hours for a week, and determined he worked 60 hours. That being said, he does discuss how his pay is for nine months (unlike mine, which is for 12), and those nine months are much more intense than the three summer months. Nevertheless, 60 hours per week seems like a lot!
With these thoughts in mind, I decided to track my work week (to the nearest 0.5 hr) from Monday to Friday of last week. I also classified work time into four areas: Research, Teaching, Service, and Miscellaneous.
Research is a pretty obvious category – this is time devoted to my research program, including grant-writing, meeting and discussing with graduate students, editing manuscripts. Teaching is focused on preparing and teaching my main undergraduate course this term (a field biology course, with one 4-hour lab and one 1-hour lecture per week), and I organize a graduate level journal club. Service includes my administrative work for the University (e.g., Faculty committees) as well as my editorial work (I am the Editor-in-Chief for The Canadian Entomologist) and committee work for the Entomological Society of Canada. These three categories are the pillars of Academia and are typical for most University Professors.
I also had to include a category called “Miscellaneous” – this is for various tasks that don’t fall neatly into one of the other three categories. Typically, I seem to spend a fair bit of time answering e-mails and switching back and forth between different categories: it all got very confusing, so I decided to lump these periods of time into the Miscellaneous pile.
Here’s a screen shot of part of my week:
Multitasking: I clearly mix things up a lot – and seldom spend a lot of time on one task. The exception last week was grant writing, as I did manage to devote some blocks of time to that task (I have a pretty big grant application due before month’s end), and I had to do a big lab clean-up. I am, generally speaking, unable to keep working on one thing for long periods of time, and switching categories occur many times in a single day. This is one reason why time management skills are essential for success in Academia!
The research/teaching/administration balance: At a research-intensive University, such a McGill, there is certainly a high expectation on research productivity. Some weeks it feels that I never spend any time doing research (and I fully admit that my actual ‘laboratory’ time working on a microscope is limited), so I was quite pleased that over 40% of my time was in this category. The second largest category was teaching at just below 40%. This can be highly variable depending on the Academic term. Some terms have more intensive teaching demands, and I’m sure that at those times, Teaching could easily exceed 50% of the time. If teaching a new course, development of lectures and content is also time consuming, and would push the Teaching category well ahead of Research. For me, I am teaching a course that I have taught before, and have a relatively light teaching load this term, so it makes sense that it is below 40%.
I spent relatively little time on ‘Service’, but this is quite variable by week. For example, some weeks my editorial work for The Canadian Entomologist can take a lot more time, and some weeks I have additional committee work to do with my Faculty / University.
You often hear that at a research-intensive University, the Research: Teaching : Service split should be around 40 % : 40 % : 20 % (and these percentages are sometimes touted as being important in a pre-tenure run). I am relatively close to this, but again, this varies depending on the time of year.
Irregular hours: With an active home life, sometimes I find myself doing an extra hour of work in the evening, or getting up early to get started on the day. I don’t see this as an issue, or concern. My job allows for flexibility, and it helps ensure I’m home for dinner, and able to walk my kids to school. That being said, I think it can be assumed that Academics do not work a standard ’9 to 5′.
The work-life balance? Although I am not providing my total hours per week (some things are just too personal….), I do work less than Charter’s median for an Associate Professor, and I am very pleased about this. I have an active family life, and many interests outside of work. Again, my hours are context-dependent and have varied a lot over the past ten years. I surely worked more hours just before my tenure package was submitted, and when I’m away on a field research trip, I will easily work 10+ hours per day, for many days in a row.
That being said, I thought I worked more than what the total added up to. Did I miss something? What’s not included? By in large, I have not included commuting time, and I excluded any weekend hours. I often work several hours on the weekend – answering e-mails, and catching up on work that was missed during the week. I also excluded time writing blog posts and other social media. This is in part because I often do these things at very strange times, and also because I’m not certain how to classify this kind of outreach activity – it’s almost too fun to call work!
This exercise could be viewed as ridiculous, self-serving, and a waste of time (especially since time is such a limited resource!). From a personal level, however, I found it very worthwhile. I think it’s important to do some navel-gazing now and then, and this can help to re-evaluate the work-life balance, and hopefully make changes if they are necessary. When I first started my position at McGill, one of my mentors told me that it was very possible to be an Academic and maintain a balance with home, family life, and outside interests. I was skeptical at the time, but after ten years, I believe he was right.
I encourage others to give this a try – see how you really spend your time. It may give you encouragement, or perhaps lead you to a few lifestyle changes.