Comments on: Do students do better when they write exams faster (or slower)? http://arthropodecology.com/2015/04/29/do-students-do-better-when-they-write-exams-faster-or-slower/ Writings about arthropod ecology, arachnids & academia at McGill University Fri, 18 Sep 2015 12:00:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Recommended Reads #52 | Small Pond Science http://arthropodecology.com/2015/04/29/do-students-do-better-when-they-write-exams-faster-or-slower/#comment-80268 Fri, 08 May 2015 12:03:34 +0000 http://arthropodecology.com/?p=2593#comment-80268 […] more from Arthropod Ecology: Do students who complete an exam more quickly (or more slowly) do better on the exam? Chris Buddle’s answer is “no.” (I actually did the the same thing several years […]

]]>
By: Chris Buddle http://arthropodecology.com/2015/04/29/do-students-do-better-when-they-write-exams-faster-or-slower/#comment-79811 Wed, 06 May 2015 13:43:24 +0000 http://arthropodecology.com/?p=2593#comment-79811 Thanks Auriel – for the comment. That is an important insight you provided. I think “we” (profs) judge students all the time, whether or not we know it. Sigh.

]]>
By: Auriel Fournier (@RallidaeRule) http://arthropodecology.com/2015/04/29/do-students-do-better-when-they-write-exams-faster-or-slower/#comment-79795 Tue, 05 May 2015 16:38:06 +0000 http://arthropodecology.com/?p=2593#comment-79795 As someone who takes exams very quickly, thanks for looking into this. I had a professor tell me that that they looked down on students who took exams ‘too fast’ and it always annoyed me to think that she might judge my exam differently because I finished quickly. I am the kind of person who if I sit there and wait longer I will end up second guessing myself and then I do poorly.

]]>
By: Chris Buddle http://arthropodecology.com/2015/04/29/do-students-do-better-when-they-write-exams-faster-or-slower/#comment-79773 Mon, 04 May 2015 15:41:25 +0000 http://arthropodecology.com/?p=2593#comment-79773 Peter: THANKS for the comment. Excellent points. I agree – I generally avoid MC questions for exactly that reason – incomplete knowledge is important and the idea of multi-step (& “show your work”) Qs are really important.

]]>
By: Do students do better when they write exams faster (or slower)? | Teaching for Learning @ McGill University http://arthropodecology.com/2015/04/29/do-students-do-better-when-they-write-exams-faster-or-slower/#comment-77629 Wed, 29 Apr 2015 17:08:30 +0000 http://arthropodecology.com/?p=2593#comment-77629 […] Do students do better when they write exams faster (or slower)? | Arthropod Ecology. […]

]]>
By: Peter Newbury (@polarisdotca) http://arthropodecology.com/2015/04/29/do-students-do-better-when-they-write-exams-faster-or-slower/#comment-77612 Wed, 29 Apr 2015 16:37:31 +0000 http://arthropodecology.com/?p=2593#comment-77612 Chris, you eloquently wrote,

“Assessments are always tricky business, but one overarching goal of assessments is to test about how well a student may be able to recall content, integrate that content, perhaps do calculations, and think about the material that was discussed in the classroom.”

To that list I’d add assessments should allow students to demonstrate their incomplete knowledge. That is, so you can assess the level of their understanding. A single multiple-choice questions are “all or nothing”, “you’ve got it or you don’t”. That don’t leave any room for students who understand some things but not others. Maybe that’s why we typically see a bunch of multiple-choice questions on an exam.

Questions that require multi-step calculations should not be marked “correct/incorrect” based on the number the students finally write at the bottom of the page. (I know, we always give partial credit for mathy questions – 1 pt for setting up the equations, 3 pts for solving, 1 pt for sense-making, etc.) I think that’s why we create those grading scemes / marking guides, to reward students the knowledge and skills they possess, however complete or incomplete that knowledge.

Peter
@polarisdotca

]]>