A little while ago my nephew asked me what my favourite spider was. I quickly answered “Peckhamia picata“, in part because I had recently returned from a field trip in which that species was collected (a trip to one of my favourite places in Quebec), but also because the species has the most amazing habitus: is a myrmecomorph – a species that looks a heck of a lot like an ant. Here’s a photo to illustrate this:
So, what does this species do? What are its behaviours? Where does it live?
I started digging around to see what literature exist on this species. There are certainly many publications that discuss its distribution – it is on many checklists (see here for a relatively complete list), and I was aware that it was originally described as Synemosyna picata (by Hentz, in 1846).
I did a search of Web of Science for publications with the species name, and came up with two hits. One was a systematics papers on a related genus of jumping spider, and the second was a paper by Durkee et al. in 2011*. They did some laboratory studies of the species, to assess whether or not its ant-like appearance helped it avoid being eaten by predators (spoiler: the answer is yes). A little more digging on-line took me to various sites, and in some cases, I came across this statement: “almost no information on them”
Peckhamia picata is a widespread species, with an incredible appearance, and it’s a jumping spider! Salticids are the darling of the arthropod world –> the panda bears of the invertebrates: big eyes, furry, fascinating courtship behaviours, and truckloads of ‘personality’. Surely we know SOMETHING about what I declared as my favourite species.
Thankfully, in a filing cabinet in my laboratory, I have a series of older publications on the Salticidae, including “A Revision of the Attidae of North America” by Peckham & Peckham (1909) [available here as a PDF download – note: big file!]. The George and Elizabeth Peckham did an incredible amount of work on the Salticidae (called Attidae, previously). The Peckhams are themselves a fascinating story – some details are on their Wikipedia page and I’ll summarize briefly: they were teachers (in Wisconsin), natural historians, behavioural ecologists and taxonomists, notably with jumping spiders. The bulk of their work was done in the late 1800s, and they often cited and discussed Darwinian concepts. They were awesome and I would have liked to meet them.
So, back to Peckamia picata: Their 1909 tome states the following about the species “We have described in detail its mating and general habits in Vol. II, Part 1 of the Occ. Pap. Nat. Hist. Soc. Wis. pp. 4-7)”.
So, apparently 1909 does not take us far enough back in history to learn about Peckhamia picata. Their paper from 1892 had all the details, and thankfully was fully accessible on the biodiversity heritage library.
Here is some of the lovely writings about Peckhamia picata, from the Peckhams, in 1892 (transcribed from their papers):
“While picata is ant-like in form and colour, by far the most deceptive thing about it is the way it which it moves. It does not jump like the other Attidae [Salticidae], nor does it walk in a straight line, but zig-zags continually from side to side, exactly like an ant which is out in search of booty. This is another illustration of which Wallace has shown in relation to butterflies ...”
(note: The Peckhams give a node to that Wallace guy….)
About feeding behaviour:
“Spiders commonly remain nearly motionless while they are eating; picata, on the other hand, acts liks an ant which is engaged in pulling some treasure-trove into pieces convenient for carrying I have noticed a female picata which, after getting possession of a gnat, kept beating it with her front legs as she ate, pulling it about in different directions, and all the time twitching her ant-like abdomen”
“His abdomen is lifted vertically so that it is at right angle to the plane of the cephalothorax. in this position he sways from side to side. After a moment he drops the abdomen, runs a few steps nearer the female, then then tips his body and begins to sway again. Now he runs in one direction, now in another, pausing every few moments to rock from side to side and to bend his brilliant legs so that she may look full at them.”
In sum, this journey of discovery has made me fall in love with Peckhamia picata even more. It’s also reminded me that OLD literature is essential to our current understanding of the species we identify. There is a wealth of information in these “natural history” papers – although the writing is in a different style, it is scientific, it is the foundation of current biodiversity science. We cannot ignore these older books and “Occasional papers”. We can’t rely on quick internet searches and we certainly can’t rely on literature indexed on Web of Science.
We must dig deep and far into the past. There are ‘treasure-troves’ aplenty.
*The oldest paper cited in Durkee et al. is from 1960. They did not cite the Peckhams.
Durkee, C. A. et al. 2011. Ant Mimicry Lessens Predation on a North American Jumping Spider by Larger Salticid Spiders. Environmental Entomology 40(5): 1223-1231
Peckham, G.W., and E.G. Peckham. 1892. Ant like spiders of the family Attidae Occ. Pap. Nat. Hist. Soc. Wis. II, 1 .
Peckham, G.W., and E.G. Peckham. 1909. Revision of the Attidae of North America. Trans. Wis. Academy of Sci., Arts & Letters. Vol. XVI, 1(5), 355-646.
19 thoughts on “My favourite spider species: a natural history story 120 years in the making”
Great post Chris! Love it when history can be brought in to a post to enlighten us.
Good points about the old literature! I find quite a bit of useful and informative stuff in BHL (for example: http://wp.me/p2SUYU-Af). Whenever I investigate I species more thoroughly, it is one of the first places I turn.
Thanks Sean – I WISH I always remembered to go to the old literature -I get so caught up in ‘what’s new’ that I forget that ‘old’ informs the ‘new’. The BHL is an incredible resource.
I’m a big fan of the older style of writing – scientific but also eloquent and engaging. I understand the reasons why it has evolved into today’s dry, factual, minimalist style, but perhaps as literature becomes more prelavent electronically and less so in print at least one of the roadblocks to a return to eloquence can be removed.
Thanks Ted, for the comment. Quite a few years ago I did an assignment with students in an Entomology class in which they were given a passage from an old (pre 1900) publication about an insect, and they were required to ‘make it be like it was from the 2000s’. It was a fascinating exercise, especially because it exposed us all to the beauty of that ‘engaging style’, as you mention. It would be nice to see a return to eloquence!!
An interesting twist on that assignment would be to give them a modern passage and have them ‘convert’ to the historical style.
Pingback: The Boreal Beetle ›
Pingback: The Boreal Beetle › I’m not Grandpa Simpson (although I may sound that way)
Indeed, this is fantastic. And particularly interesting in terms of our earlier discussion on Twitter.
I’ve been reading Wallace’s “Malay Archipelago” for awhile now. It’s like a case of fine wine, actually. Once a week or so I pop the cork off of the next chapter and read through it. I think it should be required reading for all biology undergrads, actually.
Awesome. Good idea re: req’d reading (see my comment to Ted, above).
Oh, and it probably goes pretty well with a glass of wine, too!
Cool idea for an assignment.
Wine… indeed! Wallace would approve, I’m sure.
Very nice article. The Peckhams made great descriptions. I have only come across one ant-mimicking jumping spider before (well one that I recognized at the time), but it also displayed the frantic, seemingly random movement of an ant. Just another reason to love a jumper.
Ah yes, the movements are SO peculiar for a jumper – the fascination about these arachnids, for me, is seemingly endless!
Pingback: Friday Recommended Reads #5 | Small Pond Science
Pingback: The Week on Sunday #39 | Splendour Awaits
Pingback: Discovering amazing arthropods › Expiscor
Pingback: The first segment › Expiscor
An excellent read, and salient point. I’ve got quite a few older books on my shelf that I don’t delve into enough.
Thanks for the info and excellent pics. I must admit I am rather fond of jumpers..
Pingback: Questions and answers about spiders | Arthropod Ecology