Last year I used twitter and blogs in my field biology class at McGill, and it was such a successful experiment that I shall do it again! Last year, students sent tweets to promote their blogs about natural history in the St Lawrence Lowlands, and the tweets were one way to disseminate information to a broad audience. This assignment also gave students an opportunity to write in different ways, and to distill information down to the most important facts.
This year things will be a little different: Students will again be completing natural history projects in the course, and will be doing so after assembling in groups early in the term. Projects will be focused on specific species found in our region, from trees to beetles, to mushrooms and mammals. Each week, students will be tweeting facts, anecdotes, and observations about their study species (and some of these tweets should come directly from the field)
So, this raises the question: why Twitter?
1. Open. Twitter allows the conversation to go out to the world, to whomever is interested. It allows ANYONE with an interest in the topic to follow along, reply, interact and collaborate. It provides an opportunity for experts on the topic to comment and improve the quality of the content and information. As an instructor in a general field biology course, I cannot be an expert on all things, and thus twitter can bring in the experts.
2. Collaboration: Twitter is terrific at fast, easy collaboration. It allows quick commentary, discussion, and is immensely user-friendly. I am especially fond of the reply features in Twitter that allow a conversation to maintain some elements of open-ness for all to see, but the direction and flavour of the conversation can be focused. Experts external to the course can quickly view the conversation and take part regardless of their geography. The quality of the ideas and content are what matters, not whether someone has a PhD, or attends a certain institution. Its requirement of 140 characters is an asset, making sure that users get to the point quickly, and thus allow opportunity for the careful construction of a sentence. It’s more difficult to write concisely and twitter presents an extreme example of this.
3. Tracking: The use of a hashtag allows easy archiving of content, including conversations, and it’s also possible to track who (outside of the course) engages with students, and has an interest in the topics. Students can monitor the activity occurring in other groups, and can learn about who to follow, who to engage with, and that can improve the quality of their own twitter use. They can track related hashtags, and find content more specific to their own project.
4. Academic value: In my experience, twitter is not fully appreciated for its academic use. Twitter has serious value, and in some circles, twitter is embraced as a teaching tool (e.g., see this & this). Education is about people, communication and collaboration as much as it is about facts and content. ANY tools that help us better connect, discuss and debate are good tools, and when we can engage a community beyond the institution’s boundaries, everyone wins. Sure, twitter can be fun and social, but its value is much deeper and more significant.
5. Validation: we all need to feel that things we do are valuable and valued. In most University classes, students write for a Professor or Teaching Assistant, sometimes for peers, but seldom for an audience beyond the institution’s walls. Last year, one of the most significant ‘A-Ha!’ moments was when students talked with delight about how they interacted with people from other countries about their natural history projects – interactions facilitated by social media tools such as twitter.
So, are you sold, now? Make a twitter account and follow along! Carly Ziter (incidentally, a TA for the class this term!) wrote an excellent ‘how to’ guide for social media (accessible from this page). Follow the hashtag #ENVB222 and take part in this class, whether you live in Brisbane, Medicine Hat, or Dublin. If you like Natural History, you’ll enjoy the experience.
10 thoughts on “Tweet tweet, twitter twitter: linking natural history and social media in a field biology class”
Dit is op wetenschapper20 herblogden reageerde:
Add your thoughts here… (optional)
Pingback: Expiscor (16 September 2013) | Arthropod Ecology
Reblogged this on iAMSTEM HUB . UC DAVIS.
Pingback: The Boreal Beetle › Beetle byte (20 September 2013 edition)
Pingback: Teaching with Twitter | Teaching and Learning Center's EDvice Exchange
Pingback: Examples of Teaching with Twitter
Pingback: Undergraduate students tweet their research questions. | Arthropod Ecology
Pingback: Tablets in the forest: using mobile technology in Higher Education | Arthropod Ecology
Pingback: Science, art, and personal reflection: Field journals as an assessment tool in higher education › Expiscor
Pingback: The effects of Twitter on student engagement and learning | Arthropod Ecology